Discussion:
#FelonDon sez ABC should be shut down, whines they're all against poor little him...
Add Reply
citizen winston smith
2024-09-11 17:33:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
No, ABC does not have to be "licensed" to be a news organization.They have to have a license to broadcast, but > that means broadcasting *anything*.
Lying POS.

https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/public-and-broadcasting#JOURNALISM

Broadcast Journalism


Introduction. As noted above, in light of the fundamental importance of
the free flow of information to our democracy, the First Amendment and
the Communications Act bar the FCC from telling station licensees how to
select material for news programs or prohibiting the broadcast of an
opinion on any subject. We also do not review anyone’s qualifications
to gather, edit, announce, or comment on the news. These decisions are
the station licensee’s responsibility. Nevertheless, there are two
issues related to broadcast journalism that are subject to Commission
regulation: hoaxes and news distortion.

Hoaxes. The broadcast by a station of false information concerning a
crime or catastrophe violates the FCC's rules if:

The station licensee knew that the information was false;
Broadcasting the false information directly causes substantial public
harm; and
It was foreseeable that broadcasting the false information would cause
such harm.
In this context, a “crime” is an act or omission that makes the offender
subject to criminal punishment by law, and a “catastrophe” is a disaster
or an imminent disaster involving violent or sudden events affecting the
public. The broadcast must cause direct and actual damage to property
or to the health or safety of the general public, or diversion of law
enforcement or other public health and safety authorities from their
duties, and the public harm must begin immediately. If a station airs a
disclaimer before the broadcast that clearly characterizes the program
as fiction and the disclaimer is presented in a reasonable manner under
the circumstances, the program is presumed not to pose foreseeable
public harm.

News Distortion. The Commission often receives complaints concerning
broadcast journalism, such as allegations that stations have aired
inaccurate or one-sided news reports or comments, covered stories
inadequately, or overly dramatized the events that they cover. For the
reasons noted previously, the Commission generally will not intervene in
these cases because it would be inconsistent with the First Amendment to
replace the journalistic judgment of licensees with our own. However,
as public trustees, broadcast licensees may not intentionally distort
the news. The FCC has stated that “rigging or slanting the news is a
most heinous act against the public interest.” The Commission will
investigate a station for news distortion if it receives documented
evidence of rigging or slanting, such as testimony or other
documentation, from individuals with direct personal knowledge that a
licensee or its management engaged in the intentional falsification of
the news. Of particular concern would be evidence of the direction to
employees from station management to falsify the news.
G
2024-09-11 18:27:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by citizen winston smith
No, ABC does not have to be "licensed" to be a news organization.They
have to have a license to broadcast, but > that means broadcasting
*anything*.
Lying POS.
https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/public-and-broadcasting#JOURNALISM
Broadcast Journalism
They oppose mein Fuehrer!

https://www.economist.com/united-states/2024/09/11/kamala-harris-makes-
donald-trump-look-out-of-his-depth
citizen winston smith
2024-09-11 19:12:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by G
Post by citizen winston smith
No, ABC does not have to be "licensed" to be a news organization.They
have to have a license to broadcast, but > that means broadcasting
*anything*.
Lying POS.
https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/public-and-broadcasting#JOURNALISM
Broadcast Journalism
They oppose mein Fuehrer!
Lying leftarded shill.

https://www.fcc.gov/media/radio/public-and-broadcasting#JOURNALISM

Broadcast Journalism


Introduction. As noted above, in light of the fundamental importance of
the free flow of information to our democracy, the First Amendment and
the Communications Act bar the FCC from telling station licensees how to
select material for news programs or prohibiting the broadcast of an
opinion on any subject. We also do not review anyone’s qualifications
to gather, edit, announce, or comment on the news. These decisions are
the station licensee’s responsibility. Nevertheless, there are two
issues related to broadcast journalism that are subject to Commission
regulation: hoaxes and news distortion.

Hoaxes. The broadcast by a station of false information concerning a
crime or catastrophe violates the FCC's rules if:

The station licensee knew that the information was false;
Broadcasting the false information directly causes substantial public
harm; and
It was foreseeable that broadcasting the false information would cause
such harm.
In this context, a “crime” is an act or omission that makes the offender
subject to criminal punishment by law, and a “catastrophe” is a disaster
or an imminent disaster involving violent or sudden events affecting the
public. The broadcast must cause direct and actual damage to property
or to the health or safety of the general public, or diversion of law
enforcement or other public health and safety authorities from their
duties, and the public harm must begin immediately. If a station airs a
disclaimer before the broadcast that clearly characterizes the program
as fiction and the disclaimer is presented in a reasonable manner under
the circumstances, the program is presumed not to pose foreseeable
public harm.

News Distortion. The Commission often receives complaints concerning
broadcast journalism, such as allegations that stations have aired
inaccurate or one-sided news reports or comments, covered stories
inadequately, or overly dramatized the events that they cover. For the
reasons noted previously, the Commission generally will not intervene in
these cases because it would be inconsistent with the First Amendment to
replace the journalistic judgment of licensees with our own. However,
as public trustees, broadcast licensees may not intentionally distort
the news. The FCC has stated that “rigging or slanting the news is a
most heinous act against the public interest.” The Commission will
investigate a station for news distortion if it receives documented
evidence of rigging or slanting, such as testimony or other
documentation, from individuals with direct personal knowledge that a
licensee or its management engaged in the intentional falsification of
the news. Of particular concern would be evidence of the direction to
employees from station management to falsify the news.
citizen winston smith
2024-09-18 16:42:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Then they sane-wash his babbling.
https://washingtonstand.com/news/15-to-27-million-illegals-likely-to-vote-in-2024-experts

Do you plan to vote this November? You’re not alone. Experts say
somewhere between 1.5 million and 2.7 million illegal immigrants are
likely to cast a ballot in the 2024 elections, impacting races from dog
catcher to president of the United States.

The historic flood of illegal immigrants during the Biden-Harris
administration has also padded voter rolls, thanks to controversial
federal legislation from the Clinton administration. If illegal
immigrants and other noncitizens vote in the same proportion as in
previous U.S. elections, the number will range anywhere from
one-and-a-half to nearly three million votes.

“A 2014 academic journal found that 6.4% of noncitizens voted in 2008,”
Kerri Toloczko, executive director of Election Integrity Network and
senior advisor to the Only Citizens Vote Coalition, told The Washington
Stand. “There are about 24 million noncitizens in the U.S. right now. If
they voted only at the same rate of 6.4% this year as they did in 2008,
they would account for 1.5 million votes.”

That ponderous number of unlawful votes may just be the tip of the
iceberg. “Based on the increased noncitizen activity at state DMVs, and
the work of left-wing voter registration activists, this 6.4% could be
much higher than it was in 2008. We could be looking at over two million
unlawful noncitizen votes,” she told TWS.

Her estimate largely dovetails with a previous study showing 2.7 million
noncitizens are likely to vote in the 2024 election.

Loading...