Discussion:
California's Deadliest Fires Could Have Been Mitigated By Prevention
Add Reply
a425couple
2018-11-21 23:09:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2018/11/16/californias-deadliest-fires-could-have-been-mitigated-by-prevention/?fbclid=IwAR1FNpueXd05m6eysC1lATmCeb2n3gVQBer4oSJq72jmXOVBXk_eRj480Pk#6b9b5792341b

Nov 16, 2018, 12:06am
California's Deadliest Fires Could Have Been Mitigated By Prevention
Chuck DeVore
Contributor
Policy
Texas Public Policy Foundation VP and former California legislator

Fire burning above park at night during California Woolsey fireGETTY

At least 63 people have been killed with 631 reported missing in the
California fires as thousands of firefighters, including 200 sent from
Texas as well as other states, battle to contain the blazes. More than
7,000 structures have been destroyed, including up to 90 percent of the
homes in Paradise, population 26,682, in Northern California’s Butte
County. More than a quarter of a million people have been evacuated in
both the north of the state by the Camp Fire and by other fires in
Southern California, Hill and Woolsey.

Sparks from damaged or malfunctioning power lines operated by PG&E, a
state-regulated electric utility, may have been to blame for the Camp
Fire’s ignition amidst rugged federally-managed lands to the east of
Paradise.

As California’s fire season burst back into the headlines, President
Trump generated controversy with a weekend tweet emphasizing the role of
forest management in these fires:

There is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in
California except that forest management is so poor. Billions of dollars
are given each year, with so many lives lost, all because of gross
mismanagement of the forests. Remedy now, or no more Fed payments!"

But here is why it matters.

In my two decades of service with the California Army National Guard, we
used to darkly joke that California’s four seasons were flood, fire,
earthquake and riot. California’s rainy season will follow soon after
these fires, triggering deadly mudslides on the steep hills now being
denuded of vegetation. Mudslides, moving fast and with little warning,
have historically caused greater loss of life than fire.

Politics takes no timeout amidst the flame and smoke, and human policy
bears part of the blame for this years’ tragic toll of life and loss of
property.

When deadly fires were burning last August, Mike Marcucci, the assistant
chief of CAL FIRE, California’s main firefighting agency, noted in an
interview with the CBS affiliate in San Francisco that, “It’s a daunting
task that we’re working with some of our cooperators (i.e. federal and
local authorities) to make sure we can get some of those trees out of
the way to not add to some of the fuel.” CAL FIRE experts expanded on
the problem by blaming decades of policy that discouraged controlled
burns to reduce the fuel load in the now-burning forests in the north
and hillsides in the south, creating tinderbox conditions.

Some of the needed prescribed burns in Southern California’s coastal
chaparral and grasslands have been deterred by environmental lawsuits
and air quality concerns.

The federal government controls 46 percent of California’s land, much of
it managed by the U.S. Forest Service. In the three decades before 1990,
foresters harvested 10-12 billion board feet of timber from national
forests every year. By 2013, restrictive environmental policies cut that
to 2.5 billion. While the harvest declined, so too did tree thinning and
the clearing of brush and diseased trees. The Trump administration is
reversing that trend with the biggest harvest of trees on federal land
in 20 years, selling 3.4 billion board feet on some 3 million
acres—still just a third of the typical pre-1990 harvest.

Harvesting trees on public land is controversial but helps pay for
needed brush clearing. Many environmental groups vigorously oppose both.
But fighting the larger, hotter fires that result without active forest
management is even more costly and threatens lives.

In California, tighter environmental controls, higher prices for timber
harvesting permits and competition from overseas and pine forests in
American Southeast led to a collapse of the state's timber industry.
Employment in the industry in 2017 was half of what it was in the 1990s.

During this summer’s fires, outgoing California Governor Jerry Brown
blamed the record-breaking fires on climate change. In a press
conference he warned that the level of climate change-induced forest
fires predicted in 20 to 30 years were “now occurring in real time.”

While the frequency of fire has declined, the area burnt and the cost to
fight wildfires have increased. Understanding why this is the case is
the critical component in crafting a public policy solution to address
the issue of deadly forest fires.

Many urban liberals are calling for higher taxes on rural Californians
to pay for firefighting.

Rather than higher taxes, one solution to the constant forest management
funding shortage in California would be to look to the state’s
multibillion-dollar cap-and-trade program designed to address global
greenhouse gas emissions. California’s out of control wildfires may have
emitted up to 50 million metric tons of carbon dioxide this year alone,
about one-eighth of the entire state’s annual emissions, largely wiping
out two decades of the state’s hard fought greenhouse gas reductions for
2018. Plus, unlike a natural gas-powered electric plant or a modern car,
the fires cause terrible air quality.

California’s cap-and-trade program is now taxing some $1.5 billion a
year from the state’s economy. The lion’s share of that revenue has gone
towards California’s High-Speed Rail project. Until the fires this
summer, none of the money had been allocated for forest management or
controlled burns to reduce the fuel load until a modest $170 million was
announced in August after the last round of big fires.

Rather than continue to fund a government rail project that that was
promised as needing no tax money to build and operate, California’s
elected officials should consider prioritizing a consistent stream of
cap-and-trade revenue to more actively manage the state’s millions of
acres of forestland and coastal chaparral. Prevention saves lives.

Chuck DeVore is Vice President of National Initiatives at the Texas
Public Policy Foundation. He was a California Assemblyman and is a Lt.
Colonel in the U.S. Army Retired Reserve.
Byker
2018-11-22 00:24:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by a425couple
from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2018/11/16/californias-deadliest-fires-could-have-been-mitigated-by-prevention/?fbclid=IwAR1FNpueXd05m6eysC1lATmCeb2n3gVQBer4oSJq72jmXOVBXk_eRj480Pk#6b9b5792341b
California's Deadliest Fires Could Have Been Mitigated By Prevention
As of today it's 84 dead and 800 still missing:
https://abcnews.go.com/US/relentless-california-wildfires-leave-84-dead-800-unaccounted/story?id=59262994

It's just a matter of time before Peshtigo, Wi., takes second place:

"The 1873 Report to the Wisconsin Legislature listed 1,182 names of deceased
or missing residents.": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peshtigo_Fire

Loading Image...

https://shepherdexpress.com/around-milwaukee/great-peshtigo-fire/

https://www.fireengineering.com/articles/2007/10/remembering-the-great-peshtigo-fire-of-1871.html



Loading...