Discussion:
The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."
(too old to reply)
Ronny Koch
2018-01-18 07:18:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things
that they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons,
to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But
even more insidious than the theft of the people's weapons was
the theft of their history. Official Communist "historians"
rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many
countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history
books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist
ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted
into official "saints." Holidays were declared in honor of the
beasts who murdered countless nations.

Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here
in America?

Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy
of adulation for the so-called "Reverend Doctor Martin Luther
King, Jr." King has even had a national holiday declared in his
honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not Washington,
not Jefferson, not Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer
have holidays -- they share the generic-sounding "President's
Day.") A liberal judge has sealed the FBI files on King until
the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let's take a look at this
modern-day plastic god.

Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the
time only as "Daddy King." "Daddy King" named his son Michael.
In 1935, "Daddy King" had an inspiration to name himself after
the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his
congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as
"Martin Luther King" and to his son as "Martin Luther King, Jr."
None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. "Daddy"
King's son's real name is to this day Michael King.

King's Brazen Cheating

We read in Michael Hoffman's "Holiday for a Cheater":

The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the
Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by
Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled "Life is
What You Make It," according to the testimony of King's best
friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams.

The first book that King wrote, "Stride Toward Freedom, - -was
plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according
to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars
Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow.

And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors
of "The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official
publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent
Social Change, Inc., whose staff includes King's widow Coretta),
stated of King's writings at both Boston University and Crozer
Theological Seminary: "Judged retroactively by the standards of
academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by
numerous instances of plagiarism.... Appropriated passages are
particularly evident in his writings in his major field of
graduate study, systematic theology."

King's essay, "The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding
God," written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of
theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of "The Finding of God."

Another of King's theses, "Contemporary Continental Theology,"
written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely
stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton.

King's doctoral dissertation, "A Comparison of the Conceptions
of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman,"
for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than
fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation
of Dr. Jack Boozer, "The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich's
Concept of God."

According to "The Martin Luther King Papers", in King's
dissertation "only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on
Tillich contain five or more words that were King's own...."!

In "The Journal of American History", June 1991, page 87, David
J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says
that King's wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his
secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating. ("King's
Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation," The
Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87)

Reading Garrow's article, one is led to the inescapable
conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a
political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the
intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it
by any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the
professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University
grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89:
"King's academic compositions, especially at Boston University,
were almost without exception little more than summary
descriptions... and comparisons of other's writings.
Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter
grades, strongly suggesting that King's professors did not
expect more...." The editors of "The Martin Luther King Jr.
Papers" state that "...the failure of King's teachers to notice
his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable...."

But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us "...actually the
malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was
politically correct, he was Black, and he had ambitions. The
leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a
candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any
wonder that it has taken forty years for the truth about King's
record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public."

Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King's vision of a
racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his
cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. From the
"New York Times" of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on
October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston
University admitted that, "There is no question but that Dr.
King plagiarized in the dissertation." However, despite its
finding, the committee said that "No thought should be given to
the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an action the
panel said "would serve no purpose."

No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his
willful fraud as a student, the "reverend" and the "doctor"
should be removed from King's name.

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona
fide PhD, and his name isn't really "Martin Luther King, Jr."
What's left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating
Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his
own people.


On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin
Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the
Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander
Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles
Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West
(Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of
this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West,
along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and
acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of
the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate
demonstrations and riots.
From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate, advisor, and
personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined
the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted
of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On
January 23, 1953 the "Los Angeles Times" reported his conviction
and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and
homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of
the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he
and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference,
or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend
Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified
Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational
Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden,
was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba
Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of
the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years
Jimmy Carter's ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young,
by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School,
previously mentioned.

Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin
organized the first of King's famous marches on Washington. The
official organ of the Communist Party, "The Worker,- - openly
declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left
King's employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by
King to be second in command of the much larger march on
Washington which took place on August 28, 1963.

Bayard Rustin's replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to
King was Jack O'Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O'Dell.
According to official records, in 1962 Jack O'Dell was a member
of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had
been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O'Dell
was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC
activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis
"Globe-Democrat - -of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were
still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O'Dell's
party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King
fired O'Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the
fanfare, "immediately hired him again- - as director of the New
York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the "Richmond News-
Leader - -of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a Black man from
Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to
Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King's 1963 march on
Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak
out on behalf of King's movement. Mr. Williams was also around
this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which
he made regular broadcasts to the southern US, three times a
week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title
"Radio Free Dixie." In these broadcasts, he urged violent
attacks by Blacks against White Americans.

During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled "Negroes With
Guns." The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than
Martin Luther King, Jr. It is also interesting to note that the
editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters
of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

According to King's biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow,
"King privately described himself as a Marxist." In his 1981
book, "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", Garrow quotes King
as saying in SCLC staff meetings, "...we have moved into a new
era, which must be an era of revolution.... The whole structure
of American life must be changed.... We are engaged in the class
struggle."

Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King's
behind-the-scenes "handler." Levison, who had for years been in
charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist
Party, USA, was King's mentor and was actually the brains behind
many of King's more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited
King's book, "Stride Toward Freedom." It was Levison who
arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King's income
tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-
raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many
of King's speeches. King described Levison as one of his
"closest friends."

FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money

The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been
aware of Stanley Levison's Communist activities. It was
Levison's close association with King that brought about the
initial FBI interest in King.

Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media's lie about
"racists" in the FBI being out to "get" King, you should be
aware that the man most responsible for the FBI's probe of King
was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes
himself as a liberal, and says that initially "I was one hundred
per cent for King...because I saw him as an effective and badly
needed leader for the Black people in their desire for civil
rights." The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions
about King's Communist beliefs and associations, but it also
revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral
degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.

According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access
to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American
people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of
money contributed to the "civil rights" movement. King used SCLC
funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and
White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time,
for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days.
These types of activities were the norm for King's speaking and
organizing tours.

In fact, an outfit called The National Civil Rights Museum in
Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms
from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he
was shot, has declined to depict in any way the "occupants - -of
those rooms. That "according to exhibit designer Gerard
Eisterhold "would be "close to blasphemy." The reason? Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. spent his last night on Earth having sex
with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a
third.

Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of
numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years
with the Bureau hadáseen everything there was to be seen of the
seamy side of life, King was one of only seven people he had
ever encountered who was such a total degenerate.

Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King's
supposedly "non-violent" marches, Sullivan's probe revealed a
very different King from the carefully crafted public image.
King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members
of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of
violence. King's only admonition on the subject was that they
should embrace "tactical nonviolence."

Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a
financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not
knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually
working for the FBI.

J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information
on King's Communist connections was provided to the President
and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was
also provided to major newspapers and news wire services. But
were the American people informed of King's real nature? No, for
even in the 1960s, the fix was in "the controlled media and the
bought politicians were bound and determined to push their
racial mixing program on America. King was their man and nothing
was going to get in their way. With a few minor exceptions,
these facts have been kept from the American people. The pro-
King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that
a serious proposal has been made to add some of King's writings
as a new book in the Bible.

Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far
greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of
this man called King. I want you to start to think for
yourselves. I want you to consider this: What are the forces and
motivation behind the controlled media's active promotion of
King? What does it tell you about our politicians when you see
them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to
honor King as a national hero? What does it tell you about our
society when any public criticism of this moral leper and
Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal? What
does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how
they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a
picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie?
You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to
wake up.


Sources:

1. The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official
publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent
Social Change).

2. "King's Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and
Transformation," The Journal of American History, June 1991, p.
87) David J. Garrow

3. New York Times" of October 11, 1991, page 15.

4. "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", David J. Garrow,
(1981).

5. "And the walls came tumbling down," Rev. Ralph Abernathy
(1989)

http://www.martinlutherking.org/thebeast.html
 
Bill Steele
2018-01-22 22:12:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On 1/18/18 2:18 AM, Ronny Koch wasted an incredible amount of off-topic
bandwidth repeating evrything bad ever said about Martin Luther King,
ironically preceding it with a tirade about rewriting history and adding...
Post by Ronny Koch
What does it tell you about our politicians when you see
them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to
honor King as a national hero?
It helps to be assassinated. Worked out that way for Lincoln. The
important question is, what were the assassins unhappy about? In these
cases, ending slavery an ending Jim Crow. Those are the reasons we
honor these people and regret that their work was cut short. Their work
was important enough to inspire people to hate them.

See also Jesus of Nazareth.

Loading...