Post by Rudy Canoza
On 5/22/2017 8:57 PM, spammy - an impotent squat-to-piss twat whom I
Post by andy memory
Man are you an idiot.
When you have to go back 80 years, I do wonder why you can't find a more recent
example given your claim of how frquently it happens.
14 years ago,
A lie remains a lie.
Serial journalistic lies remain serial journalistic lies.
Post by Rudy Canoza
and not systematic.
Yes - systemic.
I got an email from a friend with an image comparing two news reports on
the big FCC vote that moves us closer to gutting net neutrality. After
reading the Times' quote, it was so shockingly dishonest that my first
response was, "it must be fake."
Wow. So I went to the NY Times website to confirm, because even I, who
have known for years that the Times was nothing but a PR operation for
the 1%, couldn't believe they fallen this low.
But it was real. The version they have up now is slightly scrubbed. But
the version in the image apparently went out on the Times' wire service
and is still available from scores of small newspapers.
Here's the cited quote again:
WASHINGTON — The Federal Communications Commission voted 3-2
Thursday to move forward with a set of proposed rules aimed at
guaranteeing an open Internet, prohibiting high-speed Internet service
providers from blocking or discriminating against legal content flowing
through their pipes.
The rest of the article is just as bad, with little gems like this one:
While the rules are meant to prevent Internet providers from
knowingly slowing data, they would allow content providers to pay for a
guaranteed fast lane of service. Some opponents of the plan, those
considered net neutrality purists, argue that allowing some content to
be sent along a fast lane would essentially discriminate against other
Hey, the New York Times is employing the technique of propagandist
assholes everywhere by calling their opponents "purists". I'm impressed.
Of course, the real asshollery of that last paragraph is claiming that
the "rules are meant to prevent Internet providers from knowingly
This is just a blatant, transparent, and indisputable lie..
The New York Times is no better than Fox News. In fact, it's actually
worse. Because they are perceived to be credible. "The Gray Lady" and
all that rubbish. As such, they do far more damage than Fox will ever do.
Well, if you had any doubt, this should put an end to it. The New York
Times is just another lying piece of propaganda, at best. At worst, it
is strangely similar to a troll on an internet forum. And the sooner it
dies, the better off we'll be.
Which reminds me. What happened to all that? I thought informing the
people just "wasn't profitable anymore in the internet age" and all
these papers were going to have to shut their doors?
These are lies the New York Times wants you to believe about Russia
Our sanctions caused Russia's downturn. They protect Big Oil, the
well-connected, and make the world more dangerous
The New York Times may be regarded as prestigious but it has a long
history of constant lies, fabrications and deceit. Just google, see the
number of top level journalists who have quit the newspaper because they
could NOT put up with the constant lies!
Source: Reading the Score
“On Friday, Australian officials said the Chinese ship, the Xue
Long, or Snow Dragon, had notified the authorities that it might be
trapped by ice, one day after the Chinese used a helicopter from the
ship to rescue 52 passengers from the Russian ship, the Akademik
Shokalskiy, which had become trapped on Dec. 24. The passengers were
scientists, tourists and journalists on a research trip, the
Australasian Antarctic Expedition.” – New York Times
The-New-York-Times-007Hmm, something seems off here, doesn’t it? It’s
almost as if the Times is forgetting something. Perhaps they are
forgetting the science that those trapped scientists are researching.
Let me rephrase that: the government-funded lie that those scientists
are researching. It’s almost as if the Times is deliberately leaving out
some pertinent factoids. If you’re thinking all these things, it’s
because you’re correct.
It’s brilliant to watch just how far the mainstream media will go to
deceive us. Even more brilliant, an organization which is, by
definition, supposed to dig into every detail, uncovering all the facts,
conveniently leaving out such a pivotal detail. This situation not only
reveals how afraid the Left is of criticism, but how far they are
willing to go to avoid it.
Winston Churchill said: “A lie gets halfway around the world before the
truth has a chance to get its pants on.” The problem with a story like
this is how deep the impact of a lie can be. Even a lie of omission can
have a profound ripple. The Times, in an effort to protect their agenda,
have left out a detail which would create a crack in their pet theory.
They cannot have a point of weakness revealed, or it will lead to a
crumbling of their organization. Unfortunately, there are still some
people left who read the Times–as well as the other 98% of mainstream
media orgs that have omitted the global warming fact–and those people
will never know the truth. They will continue to believe the lie.
This lie is so important because it makes the Left look like the
bleeding hearts they so desperately want to be. Looking like they care
means that they get votes. If they get votes, they get power. And
generally, power equals money. But what does the media have to gain?
They’re not gaining votes, but they are complicit in the lie because
their agenda is in line with that of the Democrats. Additionally, the
global warming lie is extraordinarily lucrative, both in terms of
readership, as well as money. Green jobs has become a big business. If
it were revealed that it was all nonsense, money would be lost.
In the end–just like everything else in the world–the Times’ omission is
about greed, greed of ideas, greed of money, and greed of power. But we
know the truth, and once again, it’s up to us to be the new media. We
are responsible for the truth. We are responsible for informing those
around us who remain lost in the mainstream media’s deception. What a world.
So was disloyal Comey, who may also have lied.
Post by Rudy Canoza
spammy kicks himself in his little pin-dick yet again. Funny!
Little man Ball comes very much closer to his end days.