Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/

The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.

This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.

The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

[Wayne]

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

It would probably be irrelevant if only 16 percent of women were actually
interested in the job.
Right?
Gotta change that no matter what the women want.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

Post by Wayne

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

It would probably be irrelevant if only 16 percent of women were actually
interested in the job.
Right?
Gotta change that no matter what the women want.

Didn't read the article did you?

Agent Kimberly Cheeseman said one challenge with attracting women is
visibility. “I didn’t know what the Border Patrol was or what it did,
until a college professor recommended it to me as an avenue for
government service,” Cheeseman said.

Agent Melissa Pena, who joined in 2006, said the job attracts
“strong-minded women” who are leaders. An uncle urged her to apply

Once we put on the uniform, we’re all the same. And that is extremely
appealing to me,” said agent Monica Slack, who joined in 2003.

Denise Valenzuela, a 20-year-old from Texas, is starting the process
to become an agent. She initially joined the Explorer Program, a
hands-on training program for teenagers and young adults.

An outdoor type, Valenzuela likes the “adrenaline,” as well as the
different career tracks open to her, including doing undercover and
intelligence work.

“It’s not just working out in the field. You get an opportunity to
work with horses, ATVs, or intel. That’s one of the ones I really want
to end up working for,” Valenzuela said.

[2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:06:57 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Wayne

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

It would probably be irrelevant if only 16 percent of women were actually
interested in the job.
Right?
Gotta change that no matter what the women want.

Didn't read the article did you?
Agent Kimberly Cheeseman said one challenge with attracting women is
visibility. “I didn’t know what the Border Patrol was or what it did,
until a college professor recommended it to me as an avenue for
government service,” Cheeseman said.

Never heard of the Border Patrol? Guess they don't have libraries or
the internet at colleges yet.

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Agent Melissa Pena, who joined in 2006, said the job attracts
“strong-minded women” who are leaders. An uncle urged her to apply
Once we put on the uniform, we’re all the same. And that is extremely
appealing to me,” said agent Monica Slack, who joined in 2003.
Denise Valenzuela, a 20-year-old from Texas, is starting the process
to become an agent. She initially joined the Explorer Program, a
hands-on training program for teenagers and young adults.
An outdoor type, Valenzuela likes the “adrenaline,” as well as the
different career tracks open to her, including doing undercover and
intelligence work.
“It’s not just working out in the field. You get an opportunity to
work with horses, ATVs, or intel. That’s one of the ones I really want
to end up working for,” Valenzuela said.

May they succeed, serve proudly, and be safe.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:35:56 -0800, "2,693 murdered in Obama's

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:06:57 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Wayne

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

It would probably be irrelevant if only 16 percent of women were actually
interested in the job.
Right?
Gotta change that no matter what the women want.

Didn't read the article did you?
Agent Kimberly Cheeseman said one challenge with attracting women is
visibility. “I didn’t know what the Border Patrol was or what it did,
until a college professor recommended it to me as an avenue for
government service,” Cheeseman said.

Never heard of the Border Patrol? Guess they don't have libraries or
the internet at colleges yet.

Do you suppose-- even given the lack of a library or the Internet--
that you might be able to string the words "border" and "patrol"
together?

But this is how liberals think.

"We don't have a perfect 50/50 male/female ratio. We must look for
more women. Go get them, no matter how fucking ignorant they are. But
if you have to choose, choose the ones with the biggest tits."

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:06:57 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Agent Kimberly Cheeseman said one challenge with attracting women is
visibility. “I didn’t know what the Border Patrol was or what it did,
until a college professor recommended it to me as an avenue for
government service,” Cheeseman said.

Yeah.

That's the kind of recruit we need.

Bitches so fucking stupid that they don't even know what the Border
Patrol is.

But we need them because they have tits.

Typical liberal thinking.

[max headroom]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Wayne

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

It would probably be irrelevant if only 16 percent of women were actually
interested in the job.
Right?
Gotta change that no matter what the women want.

Didn't read the article did you?

<whooosh>

[2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

[Scout]

"2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

What I find interesting is the discriminatory nature of all this.

Is a federal organization were to come out and state they were only going to
hire men for the next 6 months, Liberals would be screaming how it was
discrimination.

Also one has to wonder if in their push to get more women on the force they
are going to accept substandard candidates who may end up not only being a
danger to themselves, but to their partners.

Oh, and for those that claimed the Affirmative Action is NOT
institutionalized discrimination......here it is in practice being nothing
more or less than institutionalized discrimination.

[RD Sandman]

Post by Scout
"2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

What I find interesting is the discriminatory nature of all this.
Is a federal organization were to come out and state they were only
going to hire men for the next 6 months, Liberals would be screaming
how it was discrimination.
Also one has to wonder if in their push to get more women on the force
they are going to accept substandard candidates who may end up not
only being a danger to themselves, but to their partners.
Oh, and for those that claimed the Affirmative Action is NOT
institutionalized discrimination......here it is in practice being
nothing more or less than institutionalized discrimination.

Just what is discriminatory about wanting to hire more females? As long
as they are qualified, an entity should be able to hire what it desires.
Now, if a woman (who was NOT qualified) got hired in front of some males
who were, that would be discrimination. Simply looking to identify
qualified females isn't.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Al Czervik]

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Scout
"2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

What I find interesting is the discriminatory nature of all this.
Is a federal organization were to come out and state they were only
going to hire men for the next 6 months, Liberals would be screaming
how it was discrimination.
Also one has to wonder if in their push to get more women on the force
they are going to accept substandard candidates who may end up not
only being a danger to themselves, but to their partners.
Oh, and for those that claimed the Affirmative Action is NOT
institutionalized discrimination......here it is in practice being
nothing more or less than institutionalized discrimination.

Just what is discriminatory about wanting to hire more females? As long
as they are qualified, an entity should be able to hire what it desires.
Now, if a woman (who was NOT qualified) got hired in front of some males
who were, that would be discrimination.

How is that not going to be discrimination? Even at 50/50 male to female
candidates some of the males are going to be more qualified than some of
the females that are hired - But I'm pretty sure the ratio will be like
80/20.

Post by RD Sandman
Simply looking to identify
qualified females isn't.

Did you miss this part, "The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring
spree open to women recruits only..."

[Wayne]

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Scout
"2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

What I find interesting is the discriminatory nature of all this.
Is a federal organization were to come out and state they were only
going to hire men for the next 6 months, Liberals would be screaming
how it was discrimination.
Also one has to wonder if in their push to get more women on the force
they are going to accept substandard candidates who may end up not
only being a danger to themselves, but to their partners.
Oh, and for those that claimed the Affirmative Action is NOT
institutionalized discrimination......here it is in practice being
nothing more or less than institutionalized discrimination.

Just what is discriminatory about wanting to hire more females? As long
as they are qualified, an entity should be able to hire what it desires.
Now, if a woman (who was NOT qualified) got hired in front of some males
who were, that would be discrimination.

# How is that not going to be discrimination? Even at 50/50 male to female
# candidates some of the males are going to be more qualified than some of
# the females that are hired - But I'm pretty sure the ratio will be like
# 80/20.

Post by RD Sandman
Simply looking to identify
qualified females isn't.

# Did you miss this part, "The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring
# spree open to women recruits only..."

That's my problem with it. I seriously doubt that 50% of the applicants
that want the job are women to start with.
But with sufficient incentives, it would be possible to entice women to the
job, even if they would prefer to do something else.

But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

[max headroom]

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

[RD Sandman]

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the
NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying about THIS?

I have seen some that would physically meet the requirements. ;)
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Siri Crews]

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the NFL? Why
aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends, leaving them
unqualified for football.

[RD Sandman]

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the
NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends, leaving
them unqualified for football.

What husbands or boyfriends beat up their wives leaving them unqualified
for football?
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Siri Crews]

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the
NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends, leaving
them unqualified for football.

What husbands or boyfriends beat up their wives leaving them unqualified
for football?

All of the players that beat up girlfriends and wives are qualified.

[Just Wondering]

Post by Siri Crews

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the
NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends, leaving
them unqualified for football.

What husbands or boyfriends beat up their wives leaving them unqualified
for football?

All of the players that beat up girlfriends and wives are qualified.

That's just dumb. A professional football player who does that risks
losing his career over it.

[Siri Crews]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Siri Crews

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the
NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends, leaving
them unqualified for football.

What husbands or boyfriends beat up their wives leaving them unqualified
for football?

All of the players that beat up girlfriends and wives are qualified.

That's just dumb. A professional football player who does that risks
losing his career over it.

Or beating up their children. Or their dogs.

So.........have any lost their career over it?

One coach does lose his job for looking the other way while young boys were
raped in his locker room, despite the outcry from fans. The fans were angry that
firing a famous coach would send a bad message about football to boys.

[RD Sandman]

Post by Siri Crews

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Siri Crews

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in
the NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends,
leaving them unqualified for football.

What husbands or boyfriends beat up their wives leaving them
unqualified for football?

All of the players that beat up girlfriends and wives are
qualified.

That's just dumb. A professional football player who does that risks
losing his career over it.

Or beating up their children. Or their dogs.
So.........have any lost their career over it?
One coach does lose his job for looking the other way while young boys
were raped in his locker room, despite the outcry from fans.

He, apparently, was part of the problem not just looking the other way.

The fans

Post by Siri Crews
were angry that firing a famous coach would send a bad message about
football to boys.

--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[_ G O D _]

Post by Siri Crews
One coach does lose his job for looking the other way while young
boys were raped in his locker room, despite the outcry from fans....

Don't you think he deserves more than
just losing his coaching job? Who is it?
--
---
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml
____________________________________________________

I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
along with all institutions of the industrialized slavery and genocide.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvies, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--

[RD Sandman]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Siri Crews

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the
NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends, leaving
them unqualified for football.

What husbands or boyfriends beat up their wives leaving them
unqualified for football?

All of the players that beat up girlfriends and wives are qualified.

That's just dumb. A professional football player who does that risks
losing his career over it.

As it should be.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[RD Sandman]

Post by Siri Crews

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the
NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends, leaving
them unqualified for football.

What husbands or boyfriends beat up their wives leaving them
unqualified for football?

All of the players that beat up girlfriends and wives are qualified.

What makes you certain that they were qualified to play fooball in the
first place?
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Siri Crews]

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Siri Crews

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the
NFL? Why aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends, leaving
them unqualified for football.

What husbands or boyfriends beat up their wives leaving them
unqualified for football?

All of the players that beat up girlfriends and wives are qualified.

What makes you certain that they were qualified to play fooball in the
first place?

Because they are?

[Just Wondering]

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the NFL? Why
aren't pinkies crying about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends,

Many women are. And most men aren't into beating up anyone.

Post by Siri Crews
leaving them unqualified for football.

Are you shooting for this week's non-sequitur championship award?
Because statements like that put you into the running for that award.

[Al Czervik]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the NFL? Why
aren't pinkies crying about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends,

Many women are. And most men aren't into beating up anyone.

Post by Siri Crews
leaving them unqualified for football.

Are you shooting for this week's non-sequitur championship award?
Because statements like that put you into the running for that award.

She just hates men.

[Siri Crews]

Post by Al Czervik

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the NFL? Why
aren't pinkies crying about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends,

Many women are. And most men aren't into beating up anyone.

Post by Siri Crews
leaving them unqualified for football.

Are you shooting for this week's non-sequitur championship award?
Because statements like that put you into the running for that award.

She just hates men.

Manhood requires knocking women unconscious in elevators?

[Al Czervik]

Post by Siri Crews

Post by Al Czervik

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the NFL? Why
aren't pinkies crying about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends,

Many women are. And most men aren't into beating up anyone.

Post by Siri Crews
leaving them unqualified for football.

Are you shooting for this week's non-sequitur championship award?
Because statements like that put you into the running for that award.

She just hates men.

Manhood requires knocking women unconscious in elevators?

In your fucked up world that I don't share. Ted Kennedy killed a woman
and that's OK by liberals.

[max headroom]

Post by Siri Crews

Post by max headroom

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

Hasn't anyone noticed that there are NO female Nose Tackles in the NFL? Why
aren't pinkies crying
about THIS?

Women aren't into beating up their husbands and boyfriends, leaving them
unqualified for football.

Go to an ER on a weekend....

[Scout]

Post by Wayne

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Scout
"2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

What I find interesting is the discriminatory nature of all this.
Is a federal organization were to come out and state they were only
going to hire men for the next 6 months, Liberals would be screaming
how it was discrimination.
Also one has to wonder if in their push to get more women on the force
they are going to accept substandard candidates who may end up not
only being a danger to themselves, but to their partners.
Oh, and for those that claimed the Affirmative Action is NOT
institutionalized discrimination......here it is in practice being
nothing more or less than institutionalized discrimination.

Just what is discriminatory about wanting to hire more females? As long
as they are qualified, an entity should be able to hire what it desires.
Now, if a woman (who was NOT qualified) got hired in front of some males
who were, that would be discrimination.

# How is that not going to be discrimination? Even at 50/50 male to female
# candidates some of the males are going to be more qualified than some of
# the females that are hired - But I'm pretty sure the ratio will be like
# 80/20.

Post by RD Sandman
Simply looking to identify
qualified females isn't.

# Did you miss this part, "The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring
# spree open to women recruits only..."
That's my problem with it. I seriously doubt that 50% of the applicants
that want the job are women to start with.
But with sufficient incentives, it would be possible to entice women to
the job, even if they would prefer to do something else.

And if you're offering enticements only to women to apply, then your hiring
practices are discriminatory.

Post by Wayne
But, that doesn't fit the leftie agenda that wants 50/50 in all jobs.

[RD Sandman]

Post by Al Czervik

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Scout
"2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-rec
rui tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the
Border Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women
hires, Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said.
Since then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about
five percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are
women. At most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16
percent women, Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

What I find interesting is the discriminatory nature of all this.
Is a federal organization were to come out and state they were only
going to hire men for the next 6 months, Liberals would be screaming
how it was discrimination.
Also one has to wonder if in their push to get more women on the
force they are going to accept substandard candidates who may end up
not only being a danger to themselves, but to their partners.
Oh, and for those that claimed the Affirmative Action is NOT
institutionalized discrimination......here it is in practice being
nothing more or less than institutionalized discrimination.

Just what is discriminatory about wanting to hire more females? As
long as they are qualified, an entity should be able to hire what it
desires. Now, if a woman (who was NOT qualified) got hired in front
of some males who were, that would be discrimination.

How is that not going to be discrimination? Even at 50/50 male to
female candidates some of the males are going to be more qualified
than some of the females that are hired - But I'm pretty sure the
ratio will be like 80/20.

Perhaps.

Post by Al Czervik

Post by RD Sandman
Simply looking to identify
qualified females isn't.

Did you miss this part, "The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a
hiring spree open to women recruits only..."

Since you are asking, what part of, "Now, if a woman (who was NOT
qualified) got hired in front of some males who were, that would be
discrimination." did you miss?
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Al Czervik]

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Al Czervik

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Scout
"2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-rec
rui tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the
Border Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women
hires, Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said.
Since then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about
five percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are
women. At most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16
percent women, Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

What I find interesting is the discriminatory nature of all this.
Is a federal organization were to come out and state they were only
going to hire men for the next 6 months, Liberals would be screaming
how it was discrimination.
Also one has to wonder if in their push to get more women on the
force they are going to accept substandard candidates who may end up
not only being a danger to themselves, but to their partners.
Oh, and for those that claimed the Affirmative Action is NOT
institutionalized discrimination......here it is in practice being
nothing more or less than institutionalized discrimination.

Just what is discriminatory about wanting to hire more females? As
long as they are qualified, an entity should be able to hire what it
desires. Now, if a woman (who was NOT qualified) got hired in front
of some males who were, that would be discrimination.

How is that not going to be discrimination? Even at 50/50 male to
female candidates some of the males are going to be more qualified
than some of the females that are hired - But I'm pretty sure the
ratio will be like 80/20.

Perhaps.

Post by Al Czervik

Post by RD Sandman
Simply looking to identify
qualified females isn't.

Did you miss this part, "The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a
hiring spree open to women recruits only..."

Since you are asking, what part of, "Now, if a woman (who was NOT
qualified) got hired in front of some males who were, that would be
discrimination." did you miss?

We are arguing about "if". There is no "if".

[Scout]

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Al Czervik

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Scout
"2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-rec
rui tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the
Border Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women
hires, Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said.
Since then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about
five percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are
women. At most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16
percent women, Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

What I find interesting is the discriminatory nature of all this.
Is a federal organization were to come out and state they were only
going to hire men for the next 6 months, Liberals would be screaming
how it was discrimination.
Also one has to wonder if in their push to get more women on the
force they are going to accept substandard candidates who may end up
not only being a danger to themselves, but to their partners.
Oh, and for those that claimed the Affirmative Action is NOT
institutionalized discrimination......here it is in practice being
nothing more or less than institutionalized discrimination.

Just what is discriminatory about wanting to hire more females? As
long as they are qualified, an entity should be able to hire what it
desires. Now, if a woman (who was NOT qualified) got hired in front
of some males who were, that would be discrimination.

How is that not going to be discrimination? Even at 50/50 male to
female candidates some of the males are going to be more qualified
than some of the females that are hired - But I'm pretty sure the
ratio will be like 80/20.

Perhaps.

Post by Al Czervik

Post by RD Sandman
Simply looking to identify
qualified females isn't.

Did you miss this part, "The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a
hiring spree open to women recruits only..."

Since you are asking, what part of, "Now, if a woman (who was NOT
qualified) got hired in front of some males who were, that would be
discrimination." did you miss?

And if a woman who was qualified was hired in front of males who were more
qualified, is that discrimination?

The government says it is.

[Scout]

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Scout
"2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities"

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation's borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
"We want to diversify," agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

What I find interesting is the discriminatory nature of all this.
Is a federal organization were to come out and state they were only
going to hire men for the next 6 months, Liberals would be screaming
how it was discrimination.
Also one has to wonder if in their push to get more women on the force
they are going to accept substandard candidates who may end up not
only being a danger to themselves, but to their partners.
Oh, and for those that claimed the Affirmative Action is NOT
institutionalized discrimination......here it is in practice being
nothing more or less than institutionalized discrimination.

Just what is discriminatory about wanting to hire more females?

If it were just a matter of wanting, then it wouldn't be an issue.

Having a hiring spree with the express purpose of hiring only women....then
that's discriminatory.

Post by RD Sandman
As long
as they are qualified,

And apparently the key qualification is being female.

Post by RD Sandman
an entity should be able to hire what it desires.

Fine, then the government shouldn't hold the people to a different standard
than what they hold themselves to.

Post by RD Sandman
Now, if a woman (who was NOT qualified) got hired in front of some males
who were, that would be discrimination.

And if a woman was hired in front of some males who were better qualified,
that would also be discrimination. It would also be discrimination when they
state they are ONLY going to hire females.

Post by RD Sandman
Simply looking to identify
qualified females isn't.

So they don't plan to hire those women once they are identified?

[Gronk]

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.

"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.

We read what you posted: that the Border Patrol intends to engage in
100% sex preference in hiring. That's bad, and should be illegal.

[Gronk]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.

We read what you posted: that the Border Patrol intends to engage in 100%
sex preference in hiring. That's bad, and should be illegal.

Where does it say that? Please provide an exact quote.

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by Gronk

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.

We read what you posted: that the Border Patrol intends to engage in 100%
sex preference in hiring. That's bad, and should be illegal.

Where does it say that? Please provide an exact quote.

Read above.

[Just Wondering]

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.

We read what you posted: that the Border Patrol intends to engage in
100% sex preference in hiring. That's bad, and should be illegal.

Where does it say that? Please provide an exact quote.

"The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only"

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.

We read what you posted: that the Border Patrol intends to engage in
100% sex preference in hiring. That's bad, and should be illegal.

Where does it say that? Please provide an exact quote.

"The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only"

You shouldn't let him waste your time like that. He already saw it, or
should have seen it.

[RD Sandman]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.

We read what you posted: that the Border Patrol intends to engage in
100% sex preference in hiring. That's bad, and should be illegal.

Where does it say that? Please provide an exact quote.

"The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only"

Where does it say that they won't hire any qualified men? From what I
see it is about a program aimed specifically at women. To me, that means
that the push will toward hiring women, not that they won't take male
candidates.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Just Wondering]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to

women

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its

ranks.

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified

women

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on

a

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only

from

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
their prejudice.

We read what you posted: that the Border Patrol intends to engage in
100% sex preference in hiring. That's bad, and should be illegal.

Where does it say that? Please provide an exact quote.

"The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only"

Where does it say that they won't hire any qualified men?

"OPEN TO WOMEN RECRUITS ONLY." Which means a man would only be
qualified if he is a woman. Good luck with that one.

[Al Czervik]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to

women

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its

ranks.

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified

women

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on

a

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only

from

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Gronk

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
their prejudice.

We read what you posted: that the Border Patrol intends to engage in
100% sex preference in hiring. That's bad, and should be illegal.

Where does it say that? Please provide an exact quote.

"The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only"

Where does it say that they won't hire any qualified men?

The women's public restroom at the courthouse is also open to "women
only". You should probably check it out to see if the "for women only"
part true or not. Bring a camera.

[Al Czervik]

Post by Gronk

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.

We read what you posted: that the Border Patrol intends to engage in 100%
sex preference in hiring. That's bad, and should be illegal.

Where does it say that? Please provide an exact quote.

"The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits ONLY..." [emphasis mine]

[Al Czervik]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.
"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."

You need to decide between two candidates a female who barely makes the
minimum (20 push ups in 60 seconds; 25 sit ups in 60 seconds) and a man
who is excellent shape who doubles that. The male greatly exceeds the
aptitude requirements where the female barely passes.

Who do you hire?

[Siri Crews]

Post by Al Czervik

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation¹s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitme
nt/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
³We want to diversify,² agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.
"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."

You need to decide between two candidates a female who barely makes the
minimum (20 push ups in 60 seconds; 25 sit ups in 60 seconds) and a man
who is excellent shape who doubles that. The male greatly exceeds the
aptitude requirements where the female barely passes.
Who do you hire?

Who has the best grasp of the law and knows how to manage people without
shooting them in the head or choking them to death?

[Al Czervik]

Post by Siri Crews

Post by Al Czervik

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation¹s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitme
nt/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
³We want to diversify,² agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.
"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."

You need to decide between two candidates a female who barely makes the
minimum (20 push ups in 60 seconds; 25 sit ups in 60 seconds) and a man
who is excellent shape who doubles that. The male greatly exceeds the
aptitude requirements where the female barely passes.
Who do you hire?

Who has the best grasp of the law and knows how to manage people without
shooting them in the head or choking them to death?

You've already exposed yourself as a racist and a sexist. You don't have
to avoid the question.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:58:55 -0800, Al Czervik

Post by Al Czervik

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

He's another one who hasn't even read the article and speaks only from
their prejudice.
"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."

You need to decide between two candidates a female who barely makes the
minimum (20 push ups in 60 seconds; 25 sit ups in 60 seconds) and a man
who is excellent shape who doubles that. The male greatly exceeds the
aptitude requirements where the female barely passes.
Who do you hire?

If they pass the physical fitness filter they pass.

Border Patrol agents are not hired to do push-ups so honors in
push-ups doesn't count for too much.

[2,694 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

Never claimed they were. But they aren't hired just to fill a quota -
unless they are from a minority.

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by 2,694 murdered in Obama's organized communities

Post by Gronk

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.
“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.
This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.
The first cohort of female agents joined in 1975, Hamill said. Since
then, women have remained a small minority. Currently, about five
percent nationwide, or 1,039 agents this fiscal year, are women. At
most other law enforcement agencies, the average is 16 percent women,
Hamill said.

Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

As if all men are qualified...

Never claimed they were. But they aren't hired just to fill a quota -
unless they are from a minority.

Federal agencies, especially under President Obola, hire to minority
numerical goals, not to competence.

[Bill Shatzer]

2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities wrote:
-snip-

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment

peace and justice,

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by Bill Shatzer
-snip-

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."

The absolute discrimination against men is wrong and should be illegal.

liberty and property,

[Wayne]

"Bill Shatzer" wrote in message news:m67km2$t0e$***@dont-email.me...

2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities wrote:
-snip-

Post by Bill Shatzer

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment
peace and justice,

That's fine. But, there are underlying problems.

What if the women applicants who pass the pushups/etc. do not result in a
50/50 mix?

Will the standards be lowered to achieve a 50/50 mix, or will the social
engineers accept the resulting ratio?

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

Post by Bill Shatzer
-snip-

Post by Bill Shatzer

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment
peace and justice,

That's fine. But, there are underlying problems.
What if the women applicants who pass the pushups/etc. do not result in a
50/50 mix?
Will the standards be lowered to achieve a 50/50 mix, or will the social
engineers accept the resulting ratio?

You are deluded

There is no such target, lowering of standards or "social engineering"
project.

It's really quite simple.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/

The agency is interacting with more women than it used to. In San
Diego, the number of females apprehended has grown since 2012, though
total apprehensions have fallen since then.

We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.

This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.

[Siri Crews]

Post by Bill Shatzer
-snip-

Post by Bill Shatzer

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment
peace and justice,

That's fine. But, there are underlying problems.
What if the women applicants who pass the pushups/etc. do not result in a
50/50 mix?
Will the standards be lowered to achieve a 50/50 mix, or will the social
engineers accept the resulting ratio?

What if, horror of horrors, they used that as an excuse to approach younger
girls in school and gave them an opportunity to grow up to be qualified?

[RD Sandman]

Post by Bill Shatzer
-snip-

Post by Bill Shatzer

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruit
ment
peace and justice,

That's fine. But, there are underlying problems.
What if the women applicants who pass the pushups/etc. do not result
in a 50/50 mix?
Will the standards be lowered to achieve a 50/50 mix, or will the
social engineers accept the resulting ratio?

I think I see a ton of overreaction. I doubt very much that the push is
to achieve a 50/50 mix. It is simply to find and hire more females so
that the BP is, at least closer to reality and alignment with other law
enforcement orgainizations who are running close to 26% (or so). BP.
from what I have seen is close or under 15%. That would be the quota
part. The humane part is to have women attending and overseeing the
other women.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Bill Shatzer]

RD Sandman wrote:


-snip-

Post by RD Sandman
I think I see a ton of overreaction. I doubt very much that the push is
to achieve a 50/50 mix. It is simply to find and hire more females so
that the BP is, at least closer to reality and alignment with other law
enforcement orgainizations who are running close to 26% (or so). BP.
from what I have seen is close or under 15%. That would be the quota
part. The humane part is to have women attending and overseeing the
other women.

As the article states, only 5% of the current BP agents are female.
Other law enforcement agencies average about 16% female.

The FBI seems to be working just fine with 19% women agents. No reason
why the BP should be much different.

peace and justice,

[Bill Shatzer]

Post by Bill Shatzer
-snip-

Post by Bill Shatzer

Post by 2,693 murdered in Obama's organized communities
Hopefully this social engineering won't result in unqualified women
hired ~only~ for their gender getting murdered by drug-runners on a
dark Arizona night.

"Females are held to exactly the same standards as males, down to the
number and style of push-ups."
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment

That's fine. But, there are underlying problems.

Only in your imagination. Direct your comments to THIS program, not one
which exists only in your imagination.

Post by Bill Shatzer
What if the women applicants who pass the pushups/etc. do not result in
a 50/50 mix?

So be it. Although there's nothing in the article which indicates anyone
is looking for a "50/50 mix". The article indicates that the border
patrol is seeking diversity, not equality and has no "target number of
women hires".

Post by Bill Shatzer
Will the standards be lowered to achieve a 50/50 mix, or will the social
engineers accept the resulting ratio?

That would be another program in another time, now wouldn't it? In the
meantime, I'd direct your attention back to the actual program under
current discussion where "females are held to exactly the same standards
as males."

peace and justice,

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:47:12 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

LOL

[Rudy Canoza]

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

This is bad and wrong. It's discriminatory, in an immoral way.

[Rudy Canoza]

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this? Has such past discrimination
been shown to have occurred? No. Can the fact that only 5% of Border
Patrol agents are female be taken as some kind of "evidence" that
discrimination occurred? No.

If the Border Patrol wishes to undertake publicity campaigns intended to
increase interest among women in becoming agents, that's fine. To
exclude men entirely from the pool of eligible applicants is wrong and
bad, and it is to be hoped this will be challenged in court and defeated.

[Baxter]

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against,

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is evidence of
bias in and of itself.

[Rudy Canoza]

[followups vandalism by filthy HIV+ no-morals shitbag Bugster repaired]

Post by Baxter

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this? Has such past discrimination
been shown to have occurred? No. Can the fact that only 5% of Border
Patrol agents are female be taken as some kind of "evidence" that
discrimination occurred? No.

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is evidence of
bias in and of itself.

No, it is not.

[Rudy Canoza]

[followups vandalism by filthy HIV+ no-morals shitbag Bugster repaired]

Post by Baxter

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this? Has such past discrimination
been shown to have occurred? No. Can the fact that only 5% of Border
Patrol agents are female be taken as some kind of "evidence" that
discrimination occurred? No.

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is evidence of
bias in and of itself.

No, it is not.

[Just Wondering]

Post by Baxter

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against,

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is evidence of
bias in and of itself.

So the fact that WWE wrestlers are predominately muscle-bound men proves
the WWE is sexist? So the fact that nannies are predominately women
proves that people who hire nannies are sexist? So the fact that
professional basketball players are predominately Negros proves the NBA
is a racist organization?

[RD Sandman]

Post by Baxter

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recru
i tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against,

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is
evidence of bias in and of itself.

No, it isn't. Not any more than most Seal members are male. Or most
police officers. Hell, most teachers, particularly in the elementary
grades are female.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Bill Shatzer]

Post by RD Sandman
No, it isn't. Not any more than most Seal members are male. Or most
police officers. Hell, most teachers, particularly in the elementary
grades are female.

Which is yet more evidence of sex discrimination. Traditionally, women
went into teaching because most of the other professions were closed to
women. Teaching and nursing were about the only two professions which
women college graduates could legitimately aspire to.

One of the reasons why teaching tends to pay considerably less than
other professions having similar educational requirements.

"Hell, we don't have to pay them well - where else are they gonna go?"

peace and justice,

[Al Czervik]

Post by Bill Shatzer

Post by RD Sandman
No, it isn't. Not any more than most Seal members are male. Or most
police officers. Hell, most teachers, particularly in the elementary
grades are female.

Which is yet more evidence of sex discrimination.

A very small percentage of men have the physical abilities to become a
Navy Seal. So in your world there are no female Navy Seals because of
sex discrimination.

You're an idiot.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:14:09 +0000 (UTC), Baxter

Post by Baxter

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against,

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is evidence of
bias in and of itself.

No it's not, you idiot.

Jesus you people are fucking stupid.

[Wayne]

"Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...

On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:14:09 +0000 (UTC), Baxter

Post by Baxter

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against,

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is evidence of
bias in and of itself.

# No it's not, you idiot.

# Jesus you people are fucking stupid.

LOL....I almost blew coffee out my nose when I read Baxter's dumbassed
comment.

[max headroom]

Post by Baxter

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against,

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is evidence of
bias in and of itself.

If 99% of the applicants are male and 1% are female, should the BP be restricted to hiring all the
females and an equal number of males?

We can add math to the areas in which you are deficient.

[Al Czervik]

Post by max headroom

Post by Baxter

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against,

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is evidence of
bias in and of itself.

If 99% of the applicants are male and 1% are female, should the BP be restricted to hiring all the
females and an equal number of males?
We can add math to the areas in which you are deficient.

Leroy will tell you that he's smart. He will also tell you, "the problem
with idiots is that they think they're smart."

[Al Czervik]

Post by Baxter

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against,

Just look at the results. That the BP is predominately male, is evidence of
bias in and of itself.

Like football and midwifery.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Post by Rudy Canoza
Has such past discrimination
been shown to have occurred? No. Can the fact that only 5% of Border
Patrol agents are female be taken as some kind of "evidence" that
discrimination occurred? No.
If the Border Patrol wishes to undertake publicity campaigns intended to
increase interest among women in becoming agents, that's fine. To
exclude men entirely from the pool of eligible applicants is wrong and
bad, and it is to be hoped this will be challenged in court and defeated.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
They need to hire some women.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/

The agency is interacting with more women than it used to. In San
Diego, the number of females apprehended has grown since 2012, though
total apprehensions have fallen since then.

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

No, they don't.

Quotas are illegal. Stating explicitly that only women are eligible is
a quota.

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Rudy Canoza
Has such past discrimination
been shown to have occurred? No. Can the fact that only 5% of Border
Patrol agents are female be taken as some kind of "evidence" that
discrimination occurred? No.
If the Border Patrol wishes to undertake publicity campaigns intended to
increase interest among women in becoming agents, that's fine. To
exclude men entirely from the pool of eligible applicants is wrong and
bad, and it is to be hoped this will be challenged in court and defeated.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
They need to hire some women.

They do not.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:58:41 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

No, they don't.

LOL!

They are in a better position to know that than you .

The relative number of women and unaccompanied children to be
processed has gone up.

It was in all the newspapers.

Post by Rudy Canoza
Quotas are illegal. Stating explicitly that only women are eligible is
a quota.

This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,
Hamill said.

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
They need to hire some women.

They do not.

Not your call is it?

You know absolutely nothing about the needs of the San Diego Border
Patrol.

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:58:41 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

No, they don't.

LOL!
They are in a better position to know that than you .

Too bad the story your overworked unpaid intern fed you didn't say
anything about it.

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Rudy Canoza
Quotas are illegal. Stating explicitly that only women are eligible is
a quota.

This recruitment phase does not have a target number of women hires,

It specifies only women. That's illegal.

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
They need to hire some women.

They do not.

Not your call is it?
You know absolutely nothing about the needs of the San Diego Border
Patrol.

You sure as hell don't.

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:58:41 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

No, they don't.

LOL!
They are in a better position to know that than you .

“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.

A *second reason* for the push: The agency is interacting with more
women than it used to. In San Diego, the number of females
apprehended has grown since 2012, though total apprehensions have
fallen since then.

They admit that a "need" for more women agents for any practical purpose
is not what's driving it.

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
I know absolutely nothing about the needs of the San Diego Border
Patrol.

Exactly. What you know is discrimination on invidious grounds.

[Just Wondering]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain WHY
you hold that opinion?

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain WHY
you hold that opinion?

Certainly nothing in the announcement some unpaid intern looked up and
handed to Sheila Bryant doesn't suggest any such reason.

[RD Sandman]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recr
uitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what
possible justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain
WHY you hold that opinion?

Probably because several women coming through the southern border claim
to have been molested or raped.....by the Border Patrol, not just just
the coyotes.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Just Wondering]

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recr
uitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what
possible justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain
WHY you hold that opinion?

Probably because several women coming through the southern border claim
to have been molested or raped.....by the Border Patrol, not just just
the coyotes.

Assuming that to be true, why does that translate to "They need more
women"? Why do you think simply hiring more women would address that
problem? I would conclude that translates to "They need to clean house
and rid themselves of criminal predators."

[Al Czervik]

Post by RD Sandman

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recr
uitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what
possible justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain
WHY you hold that opinion?

Probably because several women coming through the southern border claim
to have been molested or raped.....by the Border Patrol, not just just
the coyotes.

Good thing it's impossible for women to rape or molest.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:15:25 -0700, Just Wondering

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain WHY
you hold that opinion?

Try reading the article for comprehension.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/

The agency is interacting with more women than it used to. In San
Diego, the number of females apprehended has grown since 2012, though
total apprehensions have fallen since then.

[Just Wondering]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:15:25 -0700, Just Wondering

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain WHY
you hold that opinion?

Try reading the article for comprehension.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The agency is interacting with more women than it used to. In San
Diego, the number of females apprehended has grown since 2012, though
total apprehensions have fallen since then.

It is not evident that such a trend would translate into "They need more
women." That would imply that more good men couldn't do the job.
That's a sexist attitude. Try again, maybe you can still come up with a
reasonable reason why they need more women.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:57:43 -0700, Just Wondering

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:15:25 -0700, Just Wondering

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain WHY
you hold that opinion?

Try reading the article for comprehension.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The agency is interacting with more women than it used to. In San
Diego, the number of females apprehended has grown since 2012, though
total apprehensions have fallen since then.

It is not evident that such a trend would translate into "They need more
women." That would imply that more good men couldn't do the job.
That's a sexist attitude. Try again, maybe you can still come up with a
reasonable reason why they need more women.

Try using your head.

It is not remotely appropriate for men to dealing with unaccompanied
vulnerable females and minors in sexually segregated facilities.

[Al Czervik]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:57:43 -0700, Just Wondering

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:15:25 -0700, Just Wondering

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain WHY
you hold that opinion?

Try reading the article for comprehension.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The agency is interacting with more women than it used to. In San
Diego, the number of females apprehended has grown since 2012, though
total apprehensions have fallen since then.

It is not evident that such a trend would translate into "They need more
women." That would imply that more good men couldn't do the job.
That's a sexist attitude. Try again, maybe you can still come up with a
reasonable reason why they need more women.

Try using your head.
It is not remotely appropriate for men to dealing with unaccompanied
vulnerable females and minors in sexually segregated facilities.

You didn't see men at your womyn's prison?

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:15:25 -0700, Just Wondering

Post by Just Wondering

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Perhaps, but that proposition is not self-evident. Can you explain WHY
you hold that opinion?

Try reading the article for comprehension.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The agency is interacting with more women than it used to. In San
Diego, the number of females apprehended has grown since 2012, though
total apprehensions have fallen since then.

Trying reading this from your article, mackerel snatch, you lying sexist
racist asshole:

“We want to diversify,” agent Tim Hamill, a spokesman for the Border
Patrol in San Diego, said at a press event Monday.

A *second reason* for the push: The agency is interacting with more
women than it used to. In San Diego, the number of females
apprehended has grown since 2012, though total apprehensions have
fallen since then.

So, "needing" more women to deal with women and children detainees is
*NOT* the main reason, mackerel snatch. The main reason is because they
"want to diversify", i.e. they just want to discriminate against men -
same as you.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:24:37 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Why?

[Al Czervik]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Why? Are you saying that men can't do the job?

[Siri Crews]

Post by Al Czervik

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation¹s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitmen
t/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Why? Are you saying that men can't do the job?

Do you want want men to do cavity searches on women?

[Al Czervik]

Post by Siri Crews

Post by Al Czervik

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation¹s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitmen
t/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Why? Are you saying that men can't do the job?

Do you want want men to do cavity searches on women?

If you want a fair an equal workplace then men will get that job as well
just like there are many male gynecologists.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:24:24 -0800, Al Czervik

Post by Al Czervik

Post by Siri Crews

Post by Al Czervik

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation¹s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitmen
t/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Why? Are you saying that men can't do the job?

Do you want want men to do cavity searches on women?

If you want a fair an equal workplace then men will get that job as well
just like there are many male gynecologists.

Sounds like a yes.

The existence of men like you is all the evidence needed to show the
need for female LEOs and strict psychiatric screening.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:04:27 -0800, Al Czervik

Post by Al Czervik

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Why? Are you saying that men can't do the job?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/13/border-patrol-change-diapers-heat-baby-formula/?page=all

Gil Kerlikowske, commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
said Friday that many of the illegal immigrant children his agents are
encountering trying to slip across the U.S.-Mexico border have never
even seen a doctor before.

He described scenes of Border Patrol agents changing diapers and
heating baby formula in order to care for some of the youngest
children, and said agents are being asked to do things way beyond
their skill set — particularly for so many of the agents who are
young, single men.

That agent said some of the more extreme reports included having to
separate teenaged boys and girls trying to engage in sex.

“The agents have to keep an eye on them also to make sure no shady
happenings happen between the females and the males,” the agent said.

[Al Czervik]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:04:27 -0800, Al Czervik

Post by Al Czervik

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:41:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recruitment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what possible
justification could there be for this?

They need more women.

Why? Are you saying that men can't do the job?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/13/border-patrol-change-diapers-heat-baby-formula/?page=all
Gil Kerlikowske, commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
said Friday that many of the illegal immigrant children his agents are
encountering trying to slip across the U.S.-Mexico border have never
even seen a doctor before.
He described scenes of Border Patrol agents changing diapers and
heating baby formula in order to care for some of the youngest
children, and said agents are being asked to do things way beyond
their skill set — particularly for so many of the agents who are
young, single men.

So you *ARE* saying that men cannot do the job and that womyn are better
suited for taking care of babies.

I'll bet you believe it's also possible that there are a lot of BP jobs
outside of San Diego and some womyn don't want to live in the middle of
nowhere and "young, single men" do.

[Mitchell Holman]

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what
possible justification could there be for this?

Since the Border Patrol maintains dozens of
detention centers that house prisoners segregated
by gender (akin to every jail and prison) it would
make sense it needs women agents to arrest women
and search women and guard women and transport
women.

[Rudy Canoza]

Post by Mitchell Holman

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-recrui
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what
possible justification could there be for this?

Since the Border Patrol maintains dozens of
detention centers that house prisoners segregated
by gender (akin to every jail and prison) it would
make sense it needs women agents to arrest women
and search women and guard women and transport
women.

They already have them. Those people typically aren't sworn law
enforcement officers, either, and don't need to be.

[RD Sandman]

Post by Mitchell Holman

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-

recrui

Post by Mitchell Holman

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what
possible justification could there be for this?

Since the Border Patrol maintains dozens of
detention centers that house prisoners segregated
by gender (akin to every jail and prison) it would
make sense it needs women agents to arrest women
and search women and guard women and transport
women.

Methinks you have broken the code.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Just Wondering]

Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall

Post by Mitchell Holman

Post by Rudy Canoza

Wanted: A few good women to patrol the nation’s borders.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/dec/08/border-patrol-female-

recrui

Post by Mitchell Holman

Post by Rudy Canoza

tment/
The U.S. Border Patrol is kicking off a hiring spree open to women
recruits only, aimed at rebalancing the gender ratio of its ranks.

In the absence of a showing that female applicants for Border Patrol
agent positions had previously been discriminated against, what
possible justification could there be for this?

Since the Border Patrol maintains dozens of
detention centers that house prisoners segregated
by gender (akin to every jail and prison) it would
make sense it needs women agents to arrest women
and search women and guard women and transport
women.

Methinks you have broken the code.

Maybe to search and guard them, but not to arrest and transport them.